Eschatology Debate
March 11, 2007 — Pat HowellHaving read many, MANY, blog posts on this topic, I find it to be a vexing exercise. Regardless of position, there is certainly clear evidence of indwelling sin. Pride–be it intellectual, spiritual, ecclesiastical (sp?), theological, eschatological, ad infinitum ad nauseum, is ugly, reprehensible, and contrary to the gospel.
The contending for their position on the part of many very often seems primarily, almost eagerly contentious and sectarian. It does not seem to be the humble pursuit of truth for the sake of edification, worship, spiritual maturity, and the cultivation of hope in the glorious appearing and revelation of our Lord Jesus Christ.
Regardless of who said/or says what…much of the blog ambience that characterizes this discussion is a sorrow to the heart.
If JM set a bad example, than bloggers should not perpetuate or exacerbate the problem by justifying their own manifestation of that which they deplore in others.
I have enough first hand exposure to know that there is a deep affection and respect that exists between men like JM, RC Sproul, Mohler, etc. Doctrinal differences–to be sure. But a significant measure of a mans maturity is his Christ likeness in personal relationships–not his ability to verbally/theologically/exegetically slay his opposition. Particularly when one’s position on the matter at hand (while very, VERY, important), is not a matter of eternal destiny or foundational to the Sola’s of the Reformation.
Please, hold your convictions with the passion and strength they engender, but do not compromise your character in the process. It would be a pity to be correct and have no one who cares to listen to you–and this has and does happen to established and aspiring theologians of every theological orientation and conviction. Don’t be one of them, please. We really have quite enough of them already.
